Сайт Роскомнадзора атаковали18:00
总结回望2025年的育儿时光，只能说感慨万千。都说「不养儿，不知父母恩」，其实自己生了孩子到现在才觉得，「养」比「生」难的多。，推荐阅读搜狗输入法2026获取更多信息
，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026
Цены на нефть взлетели до максимума за полгода17:55，推荐阅读heLLoword翻译官方下载获取更多信息
This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.